Remote Work Problems That Persist

What has been corrected on this page?

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

1. 12 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

   2 corrections applied: Ctrip experiment randomized ~250 volunteers, not 16,000 (that was the total workforce). | DeFilippis 'Collaborating During Coronavirus' is an NBER working paper, not a Nature Human Behaviour article; the DOI was the Yang et al. paper's.

   Before

   Research by Evan DeFilippis and colleagues, published in Nature Human Behaviour in 2020, analyzed the email and meeting patterns of tens of thousands of workers before and after the pandemic shift to remote work.

   After

   Research by Evan DeFilippis and colleagues, published as an NBER Working Paper in 2020, analyzed the email and meeting patterns of tens of thousands of workers before and after the pandemic shift to remote work.

   Why: The Ctrip figure (~250 workers) was already correctly fixed in the live body text and bibliography, and the bibliography already correctly cited DeFilippis's paper as an NBER Working Paper. However, an earlier body paragraph still misattributed the same DeFilippis paper to 'Nature Human Behaviour' (a leftover from before the fix propagated). Corrected that remaining mention to match the bibliography. FAQ field checked, contains no reference to either fabrication.

   View the full record →

Who checked this page?

1 contributor has checked "Remote Work Problems That Persist" on When Notes Fly. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.