Nature vs. Nurture: What the Science Actually Shows
The nature vs. nurture debate has been largely resolved - not by declaring a winner, but by showing the question was wrong. Behavioral genetics, twin...
What has been corrected on this page?
Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.
-
2 corrections applied: MAOA gene-environment interaction paper was published in 2002, not 2003 (matches article's own reference list) | 2014 PGC schizophrenia GWAS (Ripke et al.) identified 108 loci, not 128
BeforeFAQ: "Caspi et al.'s 2003 Science paper..." and "...identified 128 genetic loci in their 2014 Nature paper."
AfterFAQ: "Caspi et al.'s 2002 Science paper..." and "...identified 108 genetic loci in their 2014 Nature paper."
Why: Article body already correctly cites Caspi et al.'s 2002 Science paper and the 2014 PGC schizophrenia GWAS's 108 loci. The FAQ JSON-LD block independently repeated both stale figures (2003, 128 loci). Fixed both in the FAQ and re-encoded via the standard base64/json op-sequence (2-step for this post); verified clean on re-fetch.
View the full record →
Who checked this page?
1 contributor has checked "Nature vs. Nurture: What the Science Actually Shows" on When Notes Fly. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.