Nature vs. Nurture: What the Science Actually Shows
Correction Concepts

Nature vs. Nurture: What the Science Actually Shows

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 11 July 2026 · View published page ↗

The nature vs. nurture debate has been largely resolved - not by declaring a winner, but by showing the question was wrong. Behavioral genetics, twin...

Factually incorrect

Changes accepted

2 edited

Computed from the content the publisher accepted, line by line. Neither the contributor nor CitePep writes this diff by hand.

edit
Caspi et al.'s 2003 Science paper
+Caspi et al.'s 2002 Science paper
edit
identified 128 significant genetic loci by 2014
+identified 108 significant genetic loci by 2014

Why this is better

Article body already correctly cites Caspi et al.'s 2002 Science paper and the 2014 PGC schizophrenia GWAS's 108 loci. The FAQ JSON-LD block independently repeated both stale figures (2003, 128 loci). Fixed both in the FAQ and re-encoded via the standard base64/json op-sequence (2-step for this post); verified clean on re-fetch.

More by Emir Baycan in Concepts

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →