AZ-104 vs AZ-500: Which Should an Azure Admin Take Second in 2026

What is this page about?

A decision guide for which exam an Azure administrator should take after the AZ-104: the security-focused AZ-500 or the architecture-focused AZ-305. It argues AZ-500 is the more strategic second exam for most admins because it deepens identity, governance, network security, and monitoring they already touch (roughly 40% overlap with AZ-104), while AZ-305 suits those moving toward solution design or pre-sales, with a comparison of what each adds, career and compensation outcomes, difficulty, and how each exam tests you.

What has been corrected on this page?

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

1. 11 July 2026 · corrected by Melik Can Sariyer

   3 originally flagged claims plus 1 additional unverified quote (John Savill) found in the same file. Mark Russinovich's real title (CTO/Technical Fellow Azure) confirmed exactly via search, but the casual joke-style quote is unverifiable -- de-attributed. Pfeiffer/Schauland claim de-attributed (though Pfeiffer/Schauland ARE real co-authors of a real Microsoft Press AZ-305 book cited correctly elsewhere in the same article). The unlinked 'Microsoft's own technology compensation studies' claim removed. ALSO VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED ACCURATE: the Heineken Azure migration case study reference is real and genuinely involves multi-region design work, matching the article's claim -- left unchanged.

   Before

   "AZ-305 reads like a McKinsey case study. AZ-500 reads like a CISSP-flavored Azure exam..." -- Mark Russinovich, CTO of Microsoft Azure / "AZ-500 is the natural depth path after AZ-104..." -- John Savill, Microsoft Technical Trainer / 'Mike Pfeiffer has written that "candidates who pick credentials they enjoy preparing for finish more of them..."' / 'Microsoft's own technology compensation studies' (alongside Skillsoft report)

   After

   AZ-305 reads like a business case study; AZ-500 reads like a security-flavored Azure exam (unattributed prose). / AZ-500 is the natural depth path after AZ-104; AZ-305 is the abstraction path (unattributed prose). / Reframed as an unattributed tiebreaker observation, without the unverified direct quote attributed to Pfeiffer/Schauland. / Removed the unlinked 'Microsoft's own technology compensation studies' claim, kept only the real Skillsoft IT Skills and Salary Report reference.

   Why: 3 originally flagged claims plus 1 additional unverified quote (John Savill) found in the same file. Mark Russinovich's real title was confirmed but the casual quote is unverifiable, de-attributed. Pfeiffer/Schauland claim de-attributed (though they ARE real co-authors of a real Microsoft Press AZ-305 book, cited correctly elsewhere in the article). The unlinked 'Microsoft's own technology compensation studies' claim removed. Verified and kept the accurate Heineken Azure migration case study reference, which is real and genuinely involves multi-region design work matching the article's claim.

   View the full record →

Who checked this page?

1 contributor has checked "AZ-104 vs AZ-500: Which Should an Azure Admin Take Second in 2026" on Pass4Sure. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.