Tradeoffs as a Universal Law

Tradeoffs as a Universal Law

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 29 July 2026 · View published page ↗

Every choice sacrifices alternatives. Speed vs accuracy, cost vs quality, flexibility vs efficiency, growth vs stability. No perfect solution exists.

Needs stronger evidenceFactually incorrect

What was corrected

What the page claimed

Article cited a nonexistent Lal/Villas-Boas price-quality study with unverified statistics, a nonexistent Shih/Pisano HBS Samsung case study, conflated Flyvbjerg's full project database with a single 2020 study, claimed Claxton's research found NICE's threshold SAVED 20,000 life-years annually (the opposite of his real published argument that the threshold is too high and costs lives), stated AWS had 31 percent cloud market share, and implied Samsung's DRAM dominance was a 2005 milestone.

What was corrected

Removed the unverified Lal/Villas-Boas study and Shih/Pisano case study, generalizing the surrounding claims to what is actually well documented; corrected the Flyvbjerg citation to distinguish his full database from his 2020 peer-reviewed paper; corrected the Claxton claim to reflect his actual conclusion that the NICE threshold is too high; corrected AWS market share to the commonly cited 32-33 percent; corrected Samsung's DRAM leadership to its accurate early-1990s origin.

Why this is better

Verified every named-study and named-statistic claim in the article's research section against the real literature; found a mix of entirely unverified citations, one citation that inverted the source's actual conclusion, and two minor figure/timeline errors.

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →