Sunk Cost Fallacy and Its Effect on Decision Making
Correction Concepts

Sunk Cost Fallacy and Its Effect on Decision Making

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 12 July 2026 · View published page ↗

The Concorde project exemplifies the sunk cost fallacy, where past investments lead to persistence in bad decisions.

Factually incorrect

Changes accepted

2 edited

Computed from the content the publisher accepted, line by line. Neither the contributor nor CitePep writes this diff by hand.

edit
Only 20 aircraft were ever built for commercial use - all sold to British Air
+Twenty Concordes were built in all (including 6 prototype, pre-production
edit
they found Roald Amundsen's Norwegian flag already planted thirty-three
+they found Roald Amundsen's Norwegian flag already planted thirty-four

Why this is better

Verified live article content already contains both corrections: the 20-total/14-production-Concorde distinction and the thirty-four-day Amundsen gap. Checked the FAQ JSON-LD schema field; it does not mention Concorde production counts or the Amundsen/Scott day gap at all. No further action needed.

More by Emir Baycan in Concepts

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →