Correction Concepts
Groupthink: How Cohesion Leads to Poor Decision-Making
Groupthink highlights how cohesive groups often make disastrous decisions due to a lack of dissent.
Factually incorrect
Changes accepted
3 edited
Computed from the content the publisher accepted, line by line. Neither the contributor nor CitePep writes this diff by hand.
−an illusion of invulnerability built up through fifty-five previous successfu…
+an illusion of invulnerability built up through twenty-four previous successf…
−extended the Janis framework to both Challenger and the later Columbia disast…
+extended the Janis framework to the Challenger disaster
−James Esser's 1998 meta-analysis, published in the Journal of Organiz…
+James Esser's 1998 meta-analysis, published in Organizational Behavio…
Why this is better
Verified live: all three corrections already present in body and bibliography - 'twenty-four previous successful launches', Moorhead et al. 1991 correctly limited to 'the Challenger disaster' only (no Columbia mention), and Esser 1998 correctly cited as 'Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes'. Checked FAQ (5 Q&A) and excerpt - no leftover fabrication found anywhere. Already fully correct, no further action needed.
More by Emir Baycan in Concepts
- Correction Learning Myths That Refuse to Die
- Correction First Principles Thinking: Elon Musk's Approach Explained
- Correction Nine Methods to Learn Anything Faster and Effectively
- Correction The Limits of Rules