Elaboration Likelihood Model: How Persuasion Actually Works
Correction Concepts

Elaboration Likelihood Model: How Persuasion Actually Works

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 11 July 2026 · View published page ↗

In 1984, Richard Petty and John Cacioppo tested how student engagement changed persuasion outcomes, showing two distinct routes to attitude change.

Factually incorrect

Changes accepted

3 edited

Computed from the content the publisher accepted, line by line. Neither the contributor nor CitePep writes this diff by hand.

edit
The Role of Involvement in Attitude Change: Elaboration and Attitude Responsi
+The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Cen
edit
Zhu and Zhang (2010) in Management Science
+Zhu and Zhang (2010) in the Journal of Marketing
edit
Han and Shavitt (1994) in the Journal of Consumer Psychology
+Han and Shavitt (1994) in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Why this is better

Body text was already correctly fixed on all three points (correct 1984 JPSP paper title, Zhu & Zhang's Journal of Marketing attribution, and Han & Shavitt's Journal of Experimental Social Psychology attribution), but the bibliography reference-list entry for Han & Shavitt (1994) still cited the stale unverified 'Journal of Consumer Psychology' with mismatched volume/pages, contradicting the already-fixed body sentence. Fixed the bibliography entry to Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 326-350 and verified clean on live re-fetch. FAQ/excerpt/meta_description/seo_keywords had no residual mention of any of the three fabrications.

More by Emir Baycan in Concepts

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →