Understanding Productivity Pain Points

What has been corrected on this page?

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

1. 2 August 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

   A review of this article's Atlassian and Microsoft workplace-productivity statistics found the specific figures could not be verified against either company's real published research, despite both companies genuinely running the initiatives described.

   What the page claimed

   The article attributed specific before/after meeting-time and "work about work" percentages (35%/25% before, 21%/18% after, from "18 months of data from approximately 10,000 employees") to Atlassian's 2020 Team Anywhere research, and attributed a 76% "not enough time in the day" figure plus a 57%/43% communication-versus-creation split to Microsoft's 2022 Work Trend Index. Neither the specific Atlassian percentages nor the 76%/57%/43% Microsoft figures could be verified against the real Atlassian distributed-work reports or the real 2022 Work Trend Index report, though Atlassian did run Team Anywhere starting in 2020 and Microsoft's 2022 report does genuinely include a real, verifiable 68% figure for insufficient focus time.

   What was corrected

   The article now describes Atlassian's real Team Anywhere initiative and its general, survey-based findings without the specific unverified before/after percentages, and describes Microsoft's real, verified 68% insufficient-focus-time figure from the 2022 Work Trend Index while removing the unverified 76% and 57%/43% figures, replacing them with the report's well-documented general finding of rising meeting and chat volume.

   Why: Both Atlassian's Team Anywhere program and Microsoft's 2022 Work Trend Index are real, but web searches against Microsoft's official Worklab pages and Atlassian's official distributed-work reports could not confirm the specific 76%, 57%/43%, or 35%/25%-to-21%/18% figures cited in the article. The one figure that could be independently verified, 68% reporting insufficient focus time, was kept; the unconfirmed figures were replaced with general, supportable descriptions of the same real research rather than a new specific statistic.

   View the full record →
2. 29 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

   Removed a citation to an entirely unverified researcher, Paul McClure, who does not exist and was credited with a nonexistent 2019 Work, Employment and Society study; corrected Shopify's real meeting-purge outcome statistics, which had been overstated with unverified specific figures not matching the company's actual reported results.

   What the page claimed

   Article attributed an unverified 2400-worker study to Paul McClure at the University of Manchester, and attributed unverified specific follow-up statistics (24 percent reinstated, 2.3 hours gained, 18 percent velocity increase) to Shopify's real meeting purge.

   What was corrected

   The unverified McClure citation was replaced with an unattributed but independently supported general finding about time-diary research on knowledge work; the Shopify figures were corrected to the company's actual reported outcomes, roughly a third less meeting time and roughly a quarter more completed projects.

   Why: Verified the named researcher and the specific follow-up statistics against real published and reported sources; found one entirely unverified researcher and one real event with included an unverified numbers attached.

   View the full record →

Who checked this page?

1 contributor has checked "Understanding Productivity Pain Points" on When Notes Fly. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.