Need for Cognition: Understanding Thought Preferences
Need for Cognition explains the enjoyment of deep thinking and its implications for behavior, based on key research.
What is this page about?
An explainer of need for cognition, the stable individual difference in how much people seek out and enjoy effortful thinking, tracing from Cohen, Stotland, and Wolfe's 1955 concept to Cacioppo and Petty's validated scale. It grounds it in the Elaboration Likelihood Model and covers four case studies (scale validation and the tendency-ability distinction, need for cognition moderating argument-quality effects, its relationship to cognitive closure and political conservatism, and consumer information processing), the empirical patterns, applications, and critiques.
What has been corrected on this page?
Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.
-
4 corrections applied: The 1982 Cacioppo & Petty scale had 34 items; the 18-item short form came in 1984 | Same finding: the 1982 scale had 34 items, not 18 | Author is Kevin Arceneaux, not Matthew; the 2013 work is a University of Chicago Press book, not an AJPS article (matches reference list) | The Fleischhauer et al. (2010) paper appeared in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, not Journal of Research in Personality (matches reference list)
Beforethe original 18-item Cacioppo-Petty scale remains the dominant instrument in the literature (body); FAQ: "It is measured by an 18-item scale asking about enjoyment of thinking tasks."
Afterthe original 34-item Cacioppo-Petty scale remains the dominant instrument in the literature (body); FAQ: "It is measured by a 34-item scale asking about enjoyment of thinking tasks."
Why: The two occurrences named in the original suggested_change were already fixed to 34-item, but a THIRD body-text mention ('the original 18-item Cacioppo-Petty scale remains the dominant instrument') and the FAQ JSON-LD block both still had the stale 18-item figure. Fixed both to 34-item (matching the 1982 Cacioppo & Petty scale) and re-encoded the FAQ via the standard op-sequence; verified clean on re-fetch. Arceneaux/Fleischhauer corrections were already correct in body and bibliography.
View the full record →
Who checked this page?
1 contributor has checked "Need for Cognition: Understanding Thought Preferences" on When Notes Fly. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.