Generalists vs Specialists

What has been corrected on this page?

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

1. 11 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

   3 corrections applied: Lovelock (b. 1919) was a mid-40s established scientist with a medical doctorate, not a young biology graduate. | Lakhani et al.'s InnoCentive study reported roughly 29.5 percent solved, not 49.6 percent. | The first systematic/successful CABG is generally credited to Rene Favaloro; removing the false primacy claim for DeBakey while keeping his early-bypass role accurate.

   Before

   In 1965, a young biology graduate named James Lovelock was hired by NASA | 49.6 percent of problems attracted at least one successful solution | a cardiac surgeon named Michael DeBakey was performing the first successful coronary artery bypass

   After

   In 1965, an established independent scientist named James Lovelock, then in his forties and trained in medicine, was hired by NASA | Approximately 29.5 percent of problems attracted at least one successful solution | a cardiac surgeon named Michael DeBakey was performing early coronary artery bypass grafting procedures

   Why: Verified live: all three corrections already present in body - Lovelock correctly described as 'an established independent scientist... then in his forties and trained in medicine', the InnoCentive figure correctly reads 'Approximately 29.5 percent', and the false DeBakey primacy claim is removed (now reads 'performing early coronary artery bypass grafting procedures' with no 'first successful' claim). Checked FAQ (8 Q&A) and excerpt - no leftover fabrication found anywhere. Already fully correct, no further action needed.

   View the full record →

Who checked this page?

1 contributor has checked "Generalists vs Specialists" on When Notes Fly. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.