Frameworks and Complexity: Simplifying Decision-Making
Concepts Corrected & verified

Frameworks and Complexity: Simplifying Decision-Making

Published by When Notes Fly · View original ↗

Discover how frameworks help simplify complexity and improve problem-solving through shared language.

What has been corrected on this page?

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

  1. 28 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

    Qualified or corrected seven claims: softened 'single most important insight in 20th-century decision science' about Simon's bounded rationality to 'one of the most influential'; flagged the 11-million/40-50-bits sensory figures as rough and debated while keeping the well-established input-vs-conscious-processing gap; correctly attributed the 1/N portfolio result to DeMiguel, Garlappi, and Uppal (2009); qualified the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist 47%/36% figures as before-and-after pilot-hospital results (Haynes et al.

    2009), not a universal guarantee; attributed the active-fund underperformance pattern to SPIVA-type data and softened 'fewer than 15%'; noted the Five Whys 'five' is a rule of thumb; and generalized an unverified-looking 1994 RAND SPC study (65% defect / 40% cost figures) to the well-documented but variable SPC improvement literature.

    What the page claimed

    The article called Simon's insight the single most important in decision science, gave precise 11M/40-50 bits figures, implied the WHO checklist universally reduces death 47%, said fewer than 15% of active funds outperform over 15 years, credited Five Whys with dramatic defect-resolution gains, and cited a 1994 RAND SPC study with 65%/40% figures.

    What was corrected

    Qualified the superlatives and rough figures, fixed the 1/N attribution, scoped the WHO and SPC results to what the sources support, and generalized the unverifiable RAND specifics.

    Why: The figures come from studies that are real but were overstated or, in the RAND case, unverifiable as cited. Corrections attribute and scope them rather than adding new sources.

    View the full record →

Who checked this page?

1 contributor has checked "Frameworks and Complexity: Simplifying Decision-Making" on When Notes Fly. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.