Transition Words for Academic Writing: A Complete Reference

What has been corrected on this page?

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

1. 19 July 2026 · corrected by Selen Ikbal Uslu

   Unverified quote attributed to Stanley Fish. This exact quote could not be verified in How to Write a Sentence or any other indexed source.; unverified quote attributed to Deirdre McCloskey. This exact quote could not be verified in Economical Writing or any other indexed source.; unverified quote attributed to Joseph Williams. This exact quote could not be verified in Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace or any other indexed source.

   Before

   <blockquote> <p>&quot;Transition words are the rails the reader runs on. Lay them carelessly and the reader derails. Lay them well and the reader travels smoothly from claim to claim without even noticing the work the writer has done.&quot; Stanley Fish, How to Write a Sentence</p> </blockquote> [...] <blockquote> <p>&quot;The writer who inserts 'therefore' without a real causal chain is asking the reader to accept a claim that the argument has not earned. Transitions that promise causation must deliver it.&quot; Deirdre McCloskey, Economical Writing</p> </blockquote> [...] <blockquote> <p>&quot;Transitions are not spackle to cover cracks in the argument. If you find yourself reaching for 'however' or 'therefore' to disguise a weak link, fix the link, not the transition.&quot; Joseph Williams, Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace</p> </blockquote>

   After

   <blockquote> <p>Writers on style, including Stanley Fish in How to Write a Sentence, have described good transitions as the mechanism that lets a reader move smoothly from claim to claim, often without noticing the work the writer put into the connections.</p> </blockquote> [...] <blockquote> <p>Writing guides such as Deirdre McCloskey's Economical Writing caution that inserting a word like 'therefore' without a real causal chain behind it asks the reader to accept a claim the argument has not actually earned.</p> </blockquote> [...] <blockquote> <p>Style guides such as Joseph Williams's Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace make the point that transitions should not be used to paper over a weak logical link; if a sentence needs 'however' or 'therefore' to disguise a gap in the argument, the fix is to strengthen the argument itself.</p> </blockquote>

   Why: Unverified quote attributed to Stanley Fish. This exact quote could not be verified in How to Write a Sentence or any other indexed source.; unverified quote attributed to Deirdre McCloskey. This exact quote could not be verified in Economical Writing or any other indexed source.; unverified quote attributed to Joseph Williams. This exact quote could not be verified in Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace or any other indexed source.

   View the full record →

Who checked this page?

1 contributor has checked "Transition Words for Academic Writing: A Complete Reference" on Evolang. Each name below links to that person's public CitePep profile, where every contribution they have made is listed with the exact change they proposed.