The Spacing Effect: Why Cramming Fails and Spaced Practice Wins
Correction Concepts

The Spacing Effect: Why Cramming Fails and Spaced Practice Wins

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 12 July 2026 · View published page ↗

The spacing effect explained through Ebbinghaus, the Cepeda meta-analysis, and Bjork's desirable difficulties, with a practical guide to spaced study.

Factually incorrect

Changes accepted

1 edited

Computed from the content the publisher accepted, line by line. Neither the contributor nor CitePep writes this diff by hand.

edit
Sutton, M. A., Ido, A. M., Hoang, A., & Carew, T. J. (2002). Molecular mechanisms underlying a unique intermediate phase of memory in Aplys…
+Sutton, M. A., Ido, A. M., Hoang, A., & Carew, T. J. (2001). Molecular mechanisms underlying a unique intermediate phase of memory in Aplys…

Why this is better

Verified fix already fully applied in the bibliography entry (only mention of this citation in the article, now reads 2001). FAQ field does not reference this study. No further changes needed.

More by Emir Baycan in Concepts

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →