The Premortem: Imagining Failure Before It Happens
Correction Decision Making

The Premortem: Imagining Failure Before It Happens

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 19 July 2026 · View published page ↗

The premortem technique explained: how imagining a project has already failed, via prospective hindsight, surfaces risks that ordinary planning misses.

Factually incorrect

The exact change

Before

"Prospective hindsight - imagining that an event has already occurred - increases the ability to correctly identify reasons for future outcomes by 30%." - Deborah J. Mitchell, J. Edward Russo, and Nancy Pennington, Back to the future: Temporal perspective in the explanation of events (1989)

After

Participants asked to imagine a future outcome had already happened and to generate explanations for it produced significantly more reasons for that outcome than participants who were only asked to imagine the outcome might happen - the 1989 Mitchell, Russo, and Pennington study measured the number of reasons generated, not the accuracy of those reasons.

Why this is better

The blockquote misstated the actual Mitchell/Russo/Pennington (1989) finding: prospective hindsight was shown to increase the NUMBER of reasons people generated for a future outcome, not the ACCURACY of those reasons. Converted the blockquote to prose and corrected the claim in both the body and the FAQ.

More by Emir Baycan in Decision Making

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →